Why all the fuss over your website??
Just strip it.
Like taste-making blog The Brilliance
Like Robb Bell's speaking tour site
Like youaresolastyear
Like Tony Morgan just did
Like Catalyst's Filter site
Like Craig's ListWhat if our church's site was stripped?
Rip off the layering... remove the shaded text effect... kill the color... let content be king... trash Flash... run off roll-overs... raw and real. It's simple. strip.
Apple's influence continues.
I'd actually like the stripped down version of your site -- other than the menu items.
Posted by: Jason Roberts | December 07, 2007 at 10:56 AM
Yeah. Something to think about. Thanks for adding me to the blog roll, too. I feel honored, bro.
Posted by: Jumaine Jones | December 07, 2007 at 11:52 AM
Like the potential of your site...it gives me great ideas for when we design ours.
Posted by: Jason Curlee | December 07, 2007 at 01:05 PM
uh, no
Posted by: Cole | December 07, 2007 at 04:56 PM
Hmmm...that's a tough one. From a designers perspective, minimal is simple, but not very interesting. However, in an incredibly fast paced internet world, perhaps simple is everything. With web, I'm convinced that the key is navigation...Big and flashy, or plain and simple, if I can't find my way around your site, I'm not going to hang around long.
You always manage to give me something to think about...thanks Ben!
Posted by: Jim Henry | December 07, 2007 at 05:15 PM
cole, you've got the anti-simple site. =)
Posted by: Ben Arment | December 07, 2007 at 05:22 PM
Ben, I like the new site look BUT, I would say stripped down website gives the impression of stripped down church. Nothing wrong with that if that is the style of church you are trying to be.
I have a rockstar complex so simple wouldn't work for us :)
Posted by: Gary | December 07, 2007 at 07:50 PM
Ben, if that's the kind of site you're looking for, I could definitely do something like that. I love the idea of a truly simple site.
Posted by: Josh Wilcox | December 07, 2007 at 09:42 PM
I agree completely. My site is semi-stripped. But, it could use to be even more simplified.
Posted by: Jason Hayes | December 07, 2007 at 11:24 PM
If you guys don't mind, may I ask a question or two...why keep it simple or maybe I should ask it this way, what is the purpose of keeping the site simplistic?
Posted by: Tim | December 08, 2007 at 11:46 AM
the definition of quality is the absence of non-quality :)
Posted by: Ben Arment | December 08, 2007 at 01:10 PM
Ben,
Forgive Cole for his comment. He is pretty protective of our site. I am ready for a FULL site overhaul personally, but we are working on other priorities right now...mainly a BIG MOVE we are about to make as to our venue.
While we are on the subject of sites...I thought you were putting me on your blogroll?
:)
Merry Christmas!
Posted by: Zak White | December 10, 2007 at 12:45 PM
Although I just recently complimented you guys on your website, I actually like the simple look! To spend off of what someone commented above, in the complex world we live in, simplicity often says more than something grandiose. It makes a larger impact even because it's so unlike EVERYTHING else. Sometimes, and maybe even most times, "less is more."
Posted by: perrin | December 10, 2007 at 09:59 PM
Hey, just an FYI: you spelled Rob Bell incorrectly.
Posted by: Ryan Ricketts | December 14, 2007 at 10:39 PM